Previous Version
3/21/2025, 4:14:45 PM
Mark has a tendency to describe films as being "not without flaws", which seems to annoy the English teachers within the [Wittertainment](Wittertainment) audience. It has been pointed out that this phrase is an example of the classical rhetorical device of litotes.
Litotes is a figure of speech consisting of an understatement in which an affirmative is expressed by negating it's opposite, such as:
* "The food wasn't inedible"
* "I didn't say I wouldn't go with you"
* "I am [nothing if not inconsistent](Nothing_if_not_inconsistent)"
A typical use within Wittertainment, from the Goal! review:
MARK: I was not unmoved.
SIMON: So you were moved then.
MARK: No! If I had meant that I would have said that!
Whilst it can be used within a film review on the [radio](5_Live) / [podcast](Podcast) / other media thing, the use of litotes can be a little vague for use in an essay or a book.
This Version
3/21/2025, 4:14:45 PM
Mark has a tendency to describe films as being "not without flaws", which seems to annoy the English teachers within the [Wittertainment](Wittertainment) audience. It has been pointed out that this phrase is an example of the classical rhetorical device of litotes.
Litotes is a figure of speech consisting of an understatement in which an affirmative is expressed by negating it's opposite, such as:
* "The food wasn't inedible"
* "I didn't say I wouldn't go with you"
* "I am [nothing if not inconsistent](Nothing_if_not_inconsistent)"
A typical use within Wittertainment, from the Goal! review:
MARK: I was not unmoved.
SIMON: So you were moved then.
MARK: No! If I had meant that I would have said that!
Whilst it can be used within a film review on the [radio](5_Live) / [podcast](Podcast) / other media thing, the use of litotes can be a little vague for use in an essay or a book.
View Original Markdown (without highlighting)
Previous Version
Litotes
Mark has a tendency to describe films as being "not without flaws", which seems to annoy the English teachers within the Wittertainment audience. It has been pointed out that this phrase is an example of the classical rhetorical device of litotes.
Litotes is a figure of speech consisting of an understatement in which an affirmative is expressed by negating it's opposite, such as:
- "The food wasn't inedible"
- "I didn't say I wouldn't go with you"
- "I am nothing if not inconsistent"
A typical use within Wittertainment, from the Goal! review:
MARK: I was not unmoved.
SIMON: So you were moved then.
MARK: No! If I had meant that I would have said that!
Whilst it can be used within a film review on the radio / podcast / other media thing, the use of litotes can be a little vague for use in an essay or a book.
This Version
Litotes
Mark has a tendency to describe films as being "not without flaws", which seems to annoy the English teachers within the Wittertainment audience. It has been pointed out that this phrase is an example of the classical rhetorical device of litotes.
Litotes is a figure of speech consisting of an understatement in which an affirmative is expressed by negating it's opposite, such as:
- "The food wasn't inedible"
- "I didn't say I wouldn't go with you"
- "I am nothing if not inconsistent"
A typical use within Wittertainment, from the Goal! review:
MARK: I was not unmoved.
SIMON: So you were moved then.
MARK: No! If I had meant that I would have said that!
Whilst it can be used within a film review on the radio / podcast / other media thing, the use of litotes can be a little vague for use in an essay or a book.