← Back to History

Changes to: 28 Weeks Later

View Page

Version from 3/21/2025, 4:10:36 PM

Previous Version

3/21/2025, 4:10:36 PM

# 28 Weeks Later



Like its predecessor, 28 Weeks Later is not a zombie film - because they're not dead, they're infected. This is important.

[Mark Kermode](Mark_Kermode) said the film was an example of [entryist filmmaking](Entryist_filmmaking), introducing its audience to anarcho-syndicalist politics.

28 Weeks Later's [BBFC](BBFC) classification of the movie as having "strong bloody gore and violence" inspired the [BBFC-style Box Office Top 10](BBFC-style_Box_Office_Top_10).

This Version

3/21/2025, 4:10:36 PM

# 28 Weeks Later



Like its predecessor, 28 Weeks Later is not a zombie film - because they're not dead, they're infected. This is important.

[Mark Kermode](Mark_Kermode) said the film was an example of [entryist filmmaking](Entryist_filmmaking), introducing its audience to anarcho-syndicalist politics.

28 Weeks Later's [BBFC](BBFC) classification of the movie as having "strong bloody gore and violence" inspired the [BBFC-style Box Office Top 10](BBFC-style_Box_Office_Top_10).
View Original Markdown (without highlighting)

Previous Version

28 Weeks Later

Like its predecessor, 28 Weeks Later is not a zombie film - because they're not dead, they're infected. This is important.

Mark Kermode said the film was an example of entryist filmmaking, introducing its audience to anarcho-syndicalist politics.

28 Weeks Later's BBFC classification of the movie as having "strong bloody gore and violence" inspired the BBFC-style Box Office Top 10.

This Version

28 Weeks Later

Like its predecessor, 28 Weeks Later is not a zombie film - because they're not dead, they're infected. This is important.

Mark Kermode said the film was an example of entryist filmmaking, introducing its audience to anarcho-syndicalist politics.

28 Weeks Later's BBFC classification of the movie as having "strong bloody gore and violence" inspired the BBFC-style Box Office Top 10.